Análisis Comparativo entre HTML5 y Prime Faces para el Desarrollo de Aplicaciones Web. Caso Aplicativo Patronato de Acción Social Nuestra Señora del Monte.

Abstract

Analysis and comparison of tecnologies HTML5 and PRIMEFACES was conducted to make a Web application which facilitates the management of shifts and medical records at the Foundation for Social Action in the Canton Quero, in the province of Tungurahua. Two modules with similar functions but different technologies were analyzed; the first was created under the PRIMEFACES Standard and the second one under the HTML5 standard. Different valuation parameters were established to determine the most suitable technology for developing Web applications. When analyzing which technology provides better efficiency when displaying the contents of a Web page. The following parameters were compared to establish which technology is more efficient: Module weight, number code lines, Web page loading time, Percentage of processor usage, total of RAM used, total of hard disk used, bandwidth used. When performing the respective evaluation and once the parameters used are determined, we obtained that HTML5 is 39.33% more efficient tan PRIMEFACES. In this way the development of the control system of shifts and medical records using HTML5 technology was carried out. After comparing both technologies HTML5 and PRIMEFACES, we conclude that to develop Web applications efficiently and with greater interactivity with the user, the technology that best fits these parameters of development and efficiency is HTML5. We recommend to use HTML5technology for the development of Web applications because it is more efficient than PRIMEFACES because it is the new standard for web design allowing cross-platform compatibility with multiple device at the same time, improving user experience and providing an alternative for developing interactive medical systems.